This essay will be around my objurgation on the second meditation from this work. Firstly, I will write the reflection and then will conclude by the giving context to it.
As in ancient time Archimedes seek to produce at least one immovable, stable address in order to move the entire knowledge base, Descartes was looking to find at least one thing in which he could be certain about. So that he began to assume that anything in this area is false and he cannot be sure about it; he is being deceived and actually he did not have whatever senses and memory. No one can be certain about in time unchangeable things such as shapes, places and extension, hence they constantly change and being false. So what is true(a) in that world? Descartes suggests that the only thing that is true in that world is the occurrence that nothing is true and certain.
However, if there is nothing certain in the world, can there be something that is not concerned even by the slightest occasion of doubt? Descartes assumes that if it is not God, who sends him these ideas, it could be himself.
front he persuaded himself that nothing pull round in this world so that his body and senses are also do not exist, so he is full of doubt whether he exists without his body and senses or not. After that he comes to conclusion that if he could persuade himself that there is no his body, no his senses, no sky above him, it does not mean that He (I in the view of Descartes) does not exist as well. Since he has persuaded Himself, this He is staying constant in every stage of the question and argument, unchanged and stable. This He is the firm Archimedean point for Descartes from which he can begin his journey to understanding what is true and completely certain.
As he found the starting...If you want to pop off a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.