Marbuary vs. madison

This doing was supported by affidavits of the following facts: that notice of this motion had been disposed(p) to Mr. Madison; that Mr. Adams, the late president of the joined States, put up the applicants to the senate for their advice and approve to be appointed justices of the peace of the district of majuscule of South Carolina; that the senate advised and consented to the appointments; that commissions in due form were sign(a) by the express president appointing them justices, &c. and that the seal of the fall in States was in due form affixed to the said commissions by the deposit of nation; that the applicants shoot requested Mr. Madison to provide them their said commissions, who has not complied with that request; and that their said commissions are withheld from them; that the applicants have make performance to Mr.

Madison as secretary of state of the United States at his office, for information whether the commissions were signed and sealed as same; that explicit and satisfactory information has not been habituated in answer to that inquiry, either by the secretary of state, or whatsoever officer in the department of state; that application has been make to the secretary of the senate for a certificate of the nomination of the applicants, and of the advice and consent of the senate, who has declined well-favoured such a certificate; whereupon a exit rein was make to show cause on the fourth part day of this term. This rule having been duly served, Mr. Jacob Wagner and Mr. Daniel Brent, who had been summoned to attend the court, and were required to happen evidence, objected to be sworn, alleging that they were clerks in the departme nt of state, and not bound to display any f! acts relating to the affair or transactions of the office. The court say the... If you want to amaze a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay